Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
news:2025:04:17_1744893115 [2025/04/17 15:40] – Cristina Grisotnews:2025:04:17_1744893115 [2025/04/17 18:17] (current) – Cristina Grisot
Line 10: Line 10:
  
  
-**SSHOC-CH first GA** and its **satellite event** successfully took place on April 11, 2025, in Bern. +The first **SSHOC-CH GA** and its **satellite event** successfully took place on April 11, 2025, in Bern. 
  
 The GA was chaired by Georg Lutz, director of FORS and president of SSHOC-CH. He noted the increasing visibility of SSHOC-CH in the research community and emphasized the progress made since its founding on April 24, 2024. Georg Lutz presented the 2024 Annual Report (read the report {{ :news:2025:04:annual_report_including_financial_report_sshoc_ch_board_2024.pdf |here}}). The GA was chaired by Georg Lutz, director of FORS and president of SSHOC-CH. He noted the increasing visibility of SSHOC-CH in the research community and emphasized the progress made since its founding on April 24, 2024. Georg Lutz presented the 2024 Annual Report (read the report {{ :news:2025:04:annual_report_including_financial_report_sshoc_ch_board_2024.pdf |here}}).
Line 30: Line 30:
 Johannes Paulmann, spokesperson for the [[https://4memory.de/|NFDI4Memory]] consortium for historically working sciences as part of the development of a National Research Data Infrastructure. 4Memory represents not only the field of history as such but also other disciplines that make use of historical data as part of their methodologies, such as economic and social history, religious studies, and area studies. It aims to ensure the quality of historical research data, thereby safeguarding the critical role of the humanities in complex, rapidly changing societies. Johannes Paulmann explained the **bottom-up creation of the NFDI4Memory consortium** and how the project was built to serve the needs of the scientific community.  Johannes Paulmann, spokesperson for the [[https://4memory.de/|NFDI4Memory]] consortium for historically working sciences as part of the development of a National Research Data Infrastructure. 4Memory represents not only the field of history as such but also other disciplines that make use of historical data as part of their methodologies, such as economic and social history, religious studies, and area studies. It aims to ensure the quality of historical research data, thereby safeguarding the critical role of the humanities in complex, rapidly changing societies. Johannes Paulmann explained the **bottom-up creation of the NFDI4Memory consortium** and how the project was built to serve the needs of the scientific community. 
  
-Lucas van der Meer, Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at [[https://odissei-data.nl/|ODISSEI]] (Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations) and Co-CTO of [[https://sshoc.nl/|SSHOC-NL]]. ODISSEI is the National Research Infrastructure for **Social Sciences** with diverse components, including access to data, expertise and computing, and offers a wide range of support opportunities. Its explicit aim is to unite the social sciences and create a common, national infrastructure for research. In 2024, ODISSEI started the SSHOC-NL collaboration with its counterpart in the **humanities** [[https://www.clariah.nl/|CLARIAH-NL]], which is the collaboration between CLARIN "Common Language Resources and Language Technology" and DARIAH "Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities". Lucas van der Meer explained the **top-down creation of SSHOC-NL** at the request of the Dutch Research Council (NWO), its governance and its internal organisation allowing the autonomy of both ODEISSEI and CLARIAH, and insisted on the importance of collaboration above all.+Lucas van der Meer, Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at [[https://odissei-data.nl/|ODISSEI]] (Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations) and Co-CTO of [[https://sshoc.nl/|SSHOC-NL]]. ODISSEI is the National Research Infrastructure for **Social Sciences** with diverse components, including access to data, expertise and computing, and offers a wide range of support opportunities. Its explicit aim is to unite the social sciences and create a common, national infrastructure for research. In 2024, ODISSEI started the SSHOC-NL collaboration with its counterpart in the **humanities** [[https://www.clariah.nl/|CLARIAH-NL]], which is the collaboration between CLARIN "Common Language Resources and Language Technology" and DARIAH "Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities". Lucas van der Meer explained the **top-down creation of SSHOC-NL** at the request of the Dutch Research Council (NWO), its governance and its internal organisation allowing the autonomy of both ODISSEI and CLARIAH, and insisted on the importance of collaboration above all (download slides [[https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/5nVfgObYjyci78u|here]]).
  
 The keynote talks were followed by a panel discussion about //**Leveraging existing synergies for the SSH: perspectives from Switzerland, Germany and the Netherlands**// The keynote talks were followed by a panel discussion about //**Leveraging existing synergies for the SSH: perspectives from Switzerland, Germany and the Netherlands**//
Line 43: Line 43:
   * Elena Chestnova (USI, member of SSHOC-CH Policy WG)   * Elena Chestnova (USI, member of SSHOC-CH Policy WG)
  
-Moderated by Cristina Grisot, the discussion was lively and insightful. Panelists were invited to discuss about the funding situation of research infrastructures in Switzerland, the role of the Academy for Social and Human Sciences in the current prioritization and funding of RIs in the SSH, the role of university libraries when it comes to providing national infrastructures for the SSH, and the case of digital editions which is a large field in the humanities and which does not have a dedicated national infrastructure, among others. +Moderated by Cristina Grisot, the discussion was lively and insightful. Panelists were invited to discuss the funding situation of research infrastructures in Switzerland, the role of the Academy for Social and Human Sciences in the current prioritization and funding of RIs in the SSH, the role of university libraries when it comes to providing national infrastructures for the SSH, and the case of digital editions which is a large field in the humanities and which does not have a dedicated national infrastructure, among others. 
  
-Report made by Cristina Grisot and Emilie Paola de Morgan+Report made by Cristina Grisot and Emilie Morgan de Paola
news/2025/04/17_1744893115.1744897259.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/17 15:40 by Cristina Grisot

Page Tools